This blog is a user's perspective on the Micro Four Thirds camera system. Read more ...

Lens Buyer's Guide. Panasonic GH4 review.

My lens reviews: Olympus 9mm f/8 fisheye, Lumix G 12-32mm f/3.5-5.6, Leica 25mm f/1.4, Lumix X 12-35mm f/2.8, Lumix X 35-100mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm f/2.8, Sigma 19mm f/2.8, Lumix X PZ 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6, Lumix X PZ 45-175mm f/4-5.6, Olympus M.Zuiko 45mm f/1.8, Panasonic Lumix G 100-300mm f/4-5.6, Panasonic Leica Lumix DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm f/2.8 1:1 Macro, Panasonic Lumix G 45-200mm f/4-5.6, Panasonic Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 pancake, Panasonic Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 pancake, Panasonic Lumix G HD 14-140mm f/4-5.8, Panasonic Lumix G HD 14-140mm f/3.5-5.6, Panasonic Lumix G 8mm f/3.5 fisheye, Lumix G 7-14mm f/4, Samyang 7.5mm f/3.5 fisheye, Tokina 300mm f/6.3 mirror reflex tele, Lensbaby 5.8mm f/3.5 circular fisheye lens
The blog contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Wednesday, 2 August 2017

Better focus with Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II

The original Lumix G 100-300mm f/4-5.6 was an affordable and basic long tele zoom lens, from the early days of Micro Four Thirds. It was generally considered a good value lens, albeit not optimally sharp in the long end, and with newer cameras, the continuous drive mode became slower in AF-C, due to a slow aperture mechanism.

Unexpectedly, since there is already the high end long tele zoom lens Leica 100-400mm, the 100-300mm lens has been upgraded to a Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II. The optical design, and, indeed, the lens body, is exactly the same, however, it gets a newer focus motor, aperture mechanism, and compatibility with newer IBIS (In Body Image Stabilization).

Lumix G 100-300mm Mk I (left) and Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II (right)

Also, it gains weather protection, with one consequence being the rubber gasket around the bayonet mount, seen to the right below:

Lumix G 100-300mm Mk I (left) and Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II (right)

I have put the lenses to the test, to see if there is any real reason to get the newer one.

Focus speed

First, the focus speed. This is a static test, with both lenses on the same camera (Lumix GX7), to see which focuses faster (Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II on the right hand side):

I triggered both cameras simultaneously using a Pixel RW-211 remote control. The video below shows the outcome of the test. First, I test them at 100mm f/4.5:

The focus delay is 0.57s for the Mk I version, and 0.55s using the Mk II version. This difference is barely worth noting, I would say they are equally fast in this test. It was done in somewhat dim indoor lightning.

In the second test at 100mm and 300mm, I test both lenses on a more modern Lumix GH5 camera:

At 100mm, the newer lens is clearly faster, with a focus delay of 0.20s (Mk II) vs 0.25s (Mk I).

At 300mm, though, I repeated the test twice with different lightning, and consistently got about about 30% slower focus with the Mk II version of the lens. This was an unexpected result. I could guess that the newer lens still has a less mature firmware, and that future firmware tweaks may improve this.

Real life use, birds in flight

One typical and challenging way to use a long tele lens, is to photograph birds in flight. This is demanding for the camera and lens, as you will typically leave the focus mode in AF-C, and trust that it gets you the bird in focus when you press the shutter fully to take the pictures.

I had the continuous drive mode enabled with the Lumix GH5 camera, and took the series of pictures under the same conditions.

I used 300mm, f/5.6, 1/640s. Note that when photographing birds in flight, you would normally use a somewhat faster shutter speed, typically around 1/1000s or more. Click for larger images:

Mk I version
(focus is generally not good)
Mk II version
(barring some motion blur, most are well in focus)

The first thing to note is that I get a faster framerate with the newer lens. This is due to the faster focus and aperture mechanisms. With the older lens, I'd say that the framerate drops to about half.

This is visible in the pictures above, in the sense that I get a longer stream of pictures to choose from with the newer lens. While this is certainly good, please note that the new lens still slows down the camera, meaning that the aperture mechanism of the newer lens is faster, but still not instantaneous.

As for the focus, the bird is much more consistently and accurately sharp with the newer lens. So with the same camera, and the same continuous focus mode, using the newer lens appears to nail the focus better. Again, this means a higher keeper rate.

Even if I was able to photograph birds in flight (BIF) using this combo, I'd say this is still a lot easier to achieve using a traditional DSLR system, at the same price point. So while the Lumix GH5 has taken continuous autofocus to a new level, it is still not nearly as good as a similarly priced DSLR camera, e.g., the Nikon D500.

Here are two more series:

Mk I version (1/4 in focus)
Mk II version (3/4 in focus)

Image quality

About the image quality, I have taken the same pictures using the Lumix GH5 camera at 300mm, f/5.6 and f/7.1. The full picture looks like this:

Here are 100% crops from the centre:

And 100% crops from a corner area:

I think this shows a somewhat better optical performance with Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II.

I only tested the lens at maximum extension, 300mm, since this tends to be the most challenging position for the lens, and it is also the way many will use it: At least I tend to use the lens almost exclusively at 300mm.


The Lumix G 100-300mm f/4-5.6 II is a nice upgrade from the first version. It adds weather protection, and the zoom ring is stiffer, meaning less zoom creep.

When using continuous autofocus on a Lumix GH5, the newer lens gives you a higher framerate, and, in my experience, better focus performance. Both are quite important for sports, birds and wildlife, which I think are key uses for a lens like this.

So, should you upgrade from your Mk I lens? If you are serious about long tele lenses, perhaps you'd rather look into the premium Leica 100-400mm.

On the other hand, the Lumix G 100-300mm f/4-5.6 II does give a real performance improvement compared with the original, and it is still smaller and lighter than the Leica 100-400mm.

While I personally wouldn't trust the weather proofing enough to take the lens outside in rain, the lens is good to bring along while travelling, as it is more likely to survive the dust, sand, and moisture issues you might encounter.


  1. Thanks for posting this well written review on the new Lumix 100-300mm lens. I bought it for my Lumix G85 (aka G80) and find it a good value lens for it's intended purpose.

  2. Thanks for the review - interesting.

  3. Thanks for updating the review with the latest version.. wondering if the 45-200mm mk2 shows similar improvements?!

    1. Honestly, I don't know. I haven't tried the newer version of the Lumix G 45-200mm f/4-5.6

  4. Nice overview!

    I really wish I had found this review before I wrote my own and before I rented the lens for an assignment - it would have been very useful and I probably would have used the Leica DG 100-400 instead.

    That being said, I actually found the weather sealing to be quite robust; long story short, I was standing waist deep in breaking waves (it was also steadily raining) and one set was more... energetic than the rest and hit the bottom of the camera/lens. But the lens and camera kept on going (thankfully) and the rental company didn't say anything after I returned it either!

    1. And this is why I never buy used lenses or cameras or former rentals. I'll eat the price difference to know it has not been swimming.

  5. Thanks for this wonderful review! I wonder how large its image circle is? I'm looking into this lens as well but the sensor of my camera happens to be super-35. Tkx.

  6. Interesting information and attractive.This blog is really rocking... Yes, the post is very interesting and I really like it.I never seen articles like this. I meant it's so knowledgeable, informative, and good looking site. I appreciate your hard work. Good job.
    Kindly visit us @
    Sathya Online Shopping
    Buy AC Online
    Buy Split AC Online
    Buy LED TV Online
    Buy Laptop Online
    Buy HD LED TV
    Buy Ultra HD TV Online
    Buy HD Ready LED TV

  7. I’m really impressed with your article, such great & usefull knowledge you mentioned here. Thank you for sharing such a good and useful information here in the blog
    Kindly visit us @
    Social Media Marketing Company India
    Social Media Marketing Packages in India
    SEO Company in India
    Google Adwords Pricing in india
    Google Adwords company in India

  8. Wow! this is Amazing! Do you know your hidden name meaning ? Click here to find your hidden name meaning

  9. Buy latest Canon DSLR camera, computer, car electronics and phone accessories. Shop at Online shopping to over 150 countries worldwide.

    Visit here:- dslr camera

  10. I got lucky to find your review on Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II in this blog. I wanted to buy this lens for a long. I heard that Lumix G 100-300mm Mk II is a very good build-in lens. The thing I liked most is the lens body, which is made of plastic parts based on a metal mount and it is assembled with very tight tolerances. The focus and zoom control rings operate pretty smooth.
    Best Regards,
    Clipping Path Services
    Clipping Path

  11. This is an excellent review about on Lumix G 100-300mm Mk. I have read this full and also seen video clips . Its an completely good job.
    Clipping Path | Remove White Background | Product Photo Editing

  12. Wow, pretty cool tips. I really appreciate your post. I definitely visit this blog again
    E-commerce Image Edit Service
    Ghost Mannequin Service

  13. Thank you so much for your best effort to review on Lumix G 100-300mm Mk. I will buy this one.

    transparent background photoshop

  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

  15. Whether you need a photo retouching for an official occasion such as wedding invitation printing or for something more personal such as scrap booking. You are curious to know more about retouch photo, find out here.

  16. Your information is really amazing which is useful for me. Thanks for your important information share for us. You are knowledgeable in this sector.

    how to remove clothing wrinkles in photoshop
    Clipping Path Asia

  17. Wow! This article is really great. Honestly it would be great for my work. Thank you for your something sharing valuable information. I will try my best because it can helpful my bright future.

    Clipping Path Asia
    how to remove clothing wrinkles in photoshop
    background removal service
    transparent background Photoshop

  18. Vertical blinds are best suitable for glass windows and doors especially for the sliding ones that used to control the flow of sunlight into the room just by tilting the vertical slats or strips made up of fabric, vinyl, wood, and aluminum. Over the necessity, one can fold up the vertical blinds completely on one side of the door or window and as the main advantage; the damaged vanes can be replaced individually from Australian Window Covering, Victoria.

    vertical blinds

  19. 3D Rendering China provides many services for a purpose like 3d Industrial modeling,3d Architectural Rendering, 3d Medical Illustration,3d Product modeling and 3d design, 3d Interior Visualisation, 3d Animation Video etc if you need design home, office and industry we make 3D design 100% unique and high quality professional creative idea and special concentrate for finishing, We 3D architectural renders supportive and trusted services.
    3d architectural rendering